Electoral initiatives let the people bypass right-wing politicians in this election, so the right wants to abolish them
By Sarah Anderson | –
( Otherwords.org) – That fall, in the run-up to the midterm elections, a group of Catholic nuns, Protestant ministers, and other faith leaders toured South Dakota in what they dubbed a “Love Your Neighbor Tour.”
Citizen-led initiatives achieved great success in the Midterms. But now this form of direct democracy is under attack.
They stopped at grocery stores, restaurants, senior centers, libraries and other community gathering places to engage with people about health insurance. They heard story after story from family members, friends and neighbors who are struggling to afford quality health care.
The goal of this tour: to build support for a campaign to help more South Dakotans get the care they need.
Such initiatives allow citizens to bypass elected officials who have separated from their constituents.
At this year’s election, voters in more than 30 states engage in this form of direct democracy. These voters enshrined abortion rights in states like Michigan, funded universal pre-child and childcare in New Mexico, and cracked down on medical debt in Arizona.
In South Dakota, the “Love Your Neighbor” campaign was a huge hit. By a margin of 56 to 44, voters approved a proposal to force their state government to expand Medicaid eligibility, a move that will help an estimated 42,500 working-class people get care.
These people make too much to qualify for the state’s existing Medicaid program, but too little to access private insurance through the Affordable Care Act. Since 2010, the federal government has covered 90 percent of the costs when states expand Medicaid but politicians step in
This isn’t the first time South Dakoto residents have employed effective people-to-people organizing and balloting strategies for the benefit of their neighbors.
In 2016, a bipartisan coalition with strong faith community support achieved an incredible victory against financial predators, winning 76 percent support for a ballot introduce a 36 percent interest rate cap on payday loans. Previously, those interest rates in South Dakota had averaged about 600 percent, trapping many low-income families in a downward spiral of debt.
This mid-election season, Nebraska offers another inspiring example of citizen action to bypass out-of-touch politicians.
For 13 years now, Congressional Republicans have blocked efforts to raise the federal minimum wage, leaving it stuck at $7.25 since 2009. Nebraska’s entire congressional delegation — all Republicans — has consistently opposed minimum wage increases. Rep. Adrian Smith, for example, recently attacked President Biden’s $15 minimum proposal as “economically harmful.”
Nebraskans see things differently.
Voters there approved a state minimum wage increase to the same level Biden proposed — $15 an hour — through 2026. The measure that has sailed through 58 percent supportmeans bigger paychecks for about
Voting actions like these can send a healthy wake-up call to political leaders who don’t listen to their voters. But certain special interests, particularly those with deep pockets and driven by narrow-minded profit motives, don’t necessarily want ordinary Americans to be heard.
State legislatures across the country have seen a spate of bills aimed at curtailing or abolishing the electoral process. According to that Strategy center for electoral initiativesthe number of such bills increased by 500 percent between 2017 and 2021. Dozens more were introduced in 2022, including efforts to raise the threshold for passing a voting measure beyond a simple majority.
The purpose of these restrictions? To undermine the will of the people.
At a time when more and more Americans are concerned about the future of our democracy, we should applaud the attorneys in South Dakota, Nebraska and elsewhere who are including their fellow citizens in the policies that affect their lives.
We need more democracy. Not less.
Sarah Anderson directs the Global Economy Project and is Associate Editor of Inequality.org at the Institute for Policy Studies.